This interview with Nick Sayers explores how mathematics, art, and experience can intersect in unexpected ways. The insights offered here challenge the traditional understanding of mathematics and demonstrate how curiosity, materials, and imagination can inform both artistic expression and learning.
I
felt like I was really bad at it.(00:06:00)
The
part of Nick’s story that resonated with me the most was his reflection on how
he believed he was “bad at maths” as a kid. Because he struggled with mental
calculations, he started to think of himself as someone who is not very good at
maths. This is how school experiences in the early years can have a big impact
on how students think about themselves. Students often associate being “good at
math” with being able to calculate quickly, and when they struggle with this,
they begin to feel like they are not good enough.
What
struck me as particularly interesting is that Nick went on to be very
passionate about geometry, programming, and mathematical art. Nick’s experience
shows that our early experiences at school are not necessarily an accurate
reflection of our abilities. Struggling with one area of maths does not mean
that someone is not a mathematical thinker.
It
also makes me think about how often schools reduce maths to numbers and speed,
rather than creativity, visual thinking, and problem-solving.
it
was kind of maths by stealth, like, it was, you know, programming and
logic and all these sorts of things are…
00:06:49
Nick’s
use of the phrase “maths by stealth” has really stuck with me, as it challenged
me to think about my own experiences with math. I had always thought that
success in math was inextricably linked with speed, accuracy, and number sense.
However, programming as Nick describes it provides a completely different point
of entry, one that is based in logic, pattern recognition, and visual thinking
rather than calculation. It made me wonder: How many students might connect
with mathematics if they encountered it this way first?
Nick’s
experience also caused me to think about how mathematics is presented in the
classroom. When students have difficulties with arithmetic, are we unintentionally
telling them that they are “bad at math”? Nick’s later experiences with
geometry and mathematical art completely contradict this notion. It is a
difficult tension to balance: is mathematics being reduced to numbers when, in
fact, it is so much more?
This
reflection resonates very strongly with my developing view as a teacher. I find
myself asking: What kinds of mathematical thinking are we failing to see when
we emphasize only the symbolic and procedural ways of thinking mathematically?
Maybe embodied, visual, and exploratory ways of thinking are not alternatives
to mathematics, but are instead crucial paths into mathematics.
Bicycle
Spirograph (~35:29)
What
really fascinated me was the concept of varying speed and gear to create
different patterns. It was a way of making something artistic and mathematical.
I started thinking about how many mathematical concepts we are exposed to every
day without even realizing it.
This stop also made me think about
teaching. It is a good example of how math does not have to start with formulas
or pictures. It can come from motion, play, and observation. The fact that
geometry is created from something as simple as riding a bike is a great way to
show how math can be interesting and dynamic.
Sunlight
Pattern (~1:10:59)
I
paused here because I was fascinated by the idea that something as ordinary as
sunlight could be harnessed to “draw” mathematics. Nick talks about how the sun's
changing position throughout the seasons creates patterns, almost like a
natural history of movement. It made me think about how mathematics can be
found in observation rather than calculation.
The
“Morse code effect” of the clouds and sunshine alternating was fascinating. It
illustrates how irregular and interrupted things, things we might think of as
flaws, can create their own patterns. It made me think about how mathematics is
full of variation and rhythm, not just perfect geometric shapes.
What
does this artist's work offer you in terms of understanding math-art
connections, and what does it offer you as a math or science teacher?
Nick
Sayers’ projects demonstrate to me that math and art are not disciplines to be
learned in isolation but, in fact, interwoven approaches to understanding the
world. By using a variety of designs and patterns, he illustrates how
mathematical concepts such as pattern, symmetry, scale, and structure can be
derived from observation. As a math or science educator, this inspires me to
create more visual, kinaesthetic, and investigative learning experiences. It
also inspires me to remember that students can learn math concepts through
creativity, observation, and play, rather than just through equations and
processes.
Hi Rosmy, thank you for your thoughtful reflection. I felt like we stopped at many of the same moments. Like what you described from India, math was often framed as speed, accuracy, and efficiency in Korea too. When “being good at math” gets reduced to quick calculation, students can internalize that label early (“I’m slow → I’m bad at math”). And sometimes what’s worse is that creative or exploratory thinking can get treated as “off-task” or disruptive—when that kind of wondering is actually close to what mathematicians do.
ReplyDeleteI also found your “Morse code effect” point really meaningful: even interruptions and variation can create patterns worth noticing, and that feels more realistic than only focusing on perfect shapes. Your post reminded me that, as teachers shaped by traditional schooling, we need to intentionally widen what counts as mathematical thinking—so students can experience math as creative, visual, exploratory, and connected to the world. Thank you!