Dylan Thomas: Coast Salish artist
This
article will look at the work of the contemporary Coast Salish artist Dylan
Thomas, whose artwork combines the best of Indigenous artistic traditions with
the concepts of mathematics, such as symmetry and geometry. Although the work
of the contemporary Coast Salish artist Dylan Thomas is rooted in the culture
of the Pacific Northwest, it also reflects the influence of traditional art
forms such as spindle whorls, houseposts, animal art, as well as contemporary
artists and the mathematical art of M.C. Escher. It will also look at the way
in which the concepts of symmetry, balance, and the interconnectedness of all
things in nature are used in the artwork.
Dylan
describes how his early exposure to Escher’s tessellations encouraged him to
make his own tessellations with traditional Coast Salish imagery, such as
salmon and birds. In his artwork, such as "Sacred Cycle" and
"Salmon Spirits," he uses symmetry and tessellations to depict
traditional cultural concepts such as the life cycle of salmon and the impact
of environmental degradation. Dylan’s artwork is not simply decorative but has
significance in terms of mentorship, tradition, and the interrelatedness of the
physical and spiritual worlds. He uses geometry to arrange his concepts in a
way that honors the fluidity and movement characteristic of Salish design.
The
article also points out how Dylan has also explored other forms of symmetry,
like reflection and complex rotation. In Horizon, symmetry has come to
represent the unity between spiritual and physical worlds. In Mandala, he has
designed a cross-cultural work that blends Coast Salish style with Buddhist
mandalas, demonstrating the potential of art to transcend different cultural
worldviews. In later works like Infinity, he has taken the mathematical theme
further, using shrinking patterns to illustrate the limitations of human
potential and the limitless possibilities in nature.
In
all, the article demonstrates the power of Dylan’s art as an example of the
potential intersection of mathematics, culture, and storytelling. His work
shows that geometry is not separate from our lives, but can be a living
language that speaks to our identities, our cultures, and our place in the natural
world.
Stop
1:
I
stopped at Dylan Thomas's descriptions of how his art pieces, such as Sacred
Cycle and Salmon Spirits, employ repeated salmon shapes arranged according to
rotational symmetry to illustrate cycles of life, cultural heritage, and
concern for the salmon population.
This
experience has altered my perspective on what geometry means and what symmetry
does beyond what has traditionally been taught to us: that symmetry is used to
make our designs aesthetically pleasing or mathematically correct. Symmetry
here has deeper cultural significance. The repeating salmon shapes are not
merely a series of shapes repeated according to a pattern; they have a deeper
meaning, illustrating cycles of life, survival, and spirituality between the
Coast Salish culture and nature. The salmon life cycle has become a visual
metaphor for life and mentoring.
This reminded me of Indian traditional art forms like Warli paintings, in which repeated drawings of humans or animals in circular patterns symbolize community, agricultural activities, or living in harmony with nature. In Warli paintings, repetition is not used to add beauty or rhythm but to emphasize the interconnectedness of all living beings. Similarly, in Dylan’s artwork, repetition of mathematical concepts emphasizes that humans, animals, or nature are all interconnected. Both forms of art emphasize that mathematics can also be a form of cultural expression, rather than being restricted to a school or college curriculum.
Stop
2:
I
stopped again when I read about Thomas’s artwork, titled “Mandala,” which
combines elements of Coast Salish design and the inward-drawing quality of
Buddhist mandalas. This artwork employs concentric circles and strategically
placed symmetrical shapes to draw the eye inward toward the center.
This part stood out to me because it shows how geometry can bring cultures that are far apart, both geographically and historically, closer together. The use of mandalas in Indian and Tibetan cultures represents the universe, balance, and the inward journey toward enlightenment. They are not simply decorations but spiritual tools for reflection and meditation. The way Dylan has combined this structure with Coast Salish symbols and shapes makes it a piece that is both particular to his heritage and universal.
This
really resonated with my experience in EDUC 550, where I created a 3 Act Math
Task using the concept of pookalam to connect culture and mathematics. The
designs created during the Onam festival in the state of Kerala, called
pookalam, use concentric circles with symmetry, pattern development, and the
use of color in a balanced way. As I was creating the 3 Act Math Task, I realized
that the student was not just learning geometry, but also learning about
culture, nature, and community through the lens of mathematics.
Dylan’s
Mandala works in a very similar way. The use of symmetry in the mandala
represents harmony, belonging, and connection to the world, nature, and the
divine. The use of circles and patterns in mandalas, as in designs from Indian
and Malayali cultures, reflects how people view the world and their place in
it.
Discussion
Question:
I
wonder how our current assessment practices might limit students when math is
connected to culture, and what new forms of assessment could better recognize
creativity, reasoning, and cultural knowledge.
Than you Rosmy.
ReplyDeleteI keep thinking about how our current math assessment practices can unintentionally limit students, especially when math is connected to culture. Most traditional assessments focus heavily on numbers, formulas, and calculations—often through timed tests or paper‑and‑pencil exams. I think this narrow focus sends a strong message that math is only about getting the right numerical answer as efficiently as possible. When assessment is framed this way, there is very little space for creativity, cultural knowledge, visual reasoning, or storytelling, even though all of those are deeply mathematical.
When we start to embed big ideas like culture, identity, and community into math, I don’t think traditional tests are enough. Understanding cultural patterns, symbolism, symmetry, or design requires time, reflection, and exploration. These are not things students can easily demonstrate in a short written test. I believe project‑based assessments are much better suited for this kind of learning. Through projects, students can design patterns, analyze cultural art forms, explain the mathematical thinking behind them, and make connections between math and lived experience.
That said, I also recognize that this approach requires more from both teachers and students. Teachers need time to plan, clear assessment criteria, and flexibility in curriculum pacing. Students may need to conduct online research, collaborate with peers, and present their thinking in multiple ways—through visuals, writing, or oral explanations. While this may feel challenging, I think it leads to deeper learning.
If we want math to be more inclusive and culturally responsive, our assessments need to value reasoning, creativity, and meaning‑making—not just computation. Changing how we assess math could change who feels successful and who feels like they belong in mathematics.
I really enjoyed reading this reflection. The way you describe geometry as a living language rather than just “making designs look nice” really landed for me. Your Stop 1 makes rotational symmetry feel purposeful, not decorative: the repeated salmon shapes become a visual metaphor for cycles of life, mentoring, and the relationship between Coast Salish culture and the natural world. I also appreciated the connection you made to Warli paintings. That parallel helped me see repetition as a cultural way of expressing interconnectedness, not simply a pattern for pattern’s sake.
ReplyDeleteYour Stop 2 was a great reminder because we literally spoke about mandalas in our last class, and reading about Thomas’s Mandala brought that conversation back in a more grounded way. I like how you describe concentric circles and symmetry as doing “work” here, drawing the eye inward while also carrying spiritual meaning. The link you make to pookalam and your EDUC 550 3-Act math task is such a strong example of how geometry can teach more than geometry: it can carry culture, community, and ecological relationships at the same time ( we spoke about something similar in last class).
This also connects closely to my thesis on household Funds of Knowledge in rural India and the question of recognition. In my fieldwork, families often use patterning, symmetry, measurement, and cyclical thinking (seasons, planting, water routines, everyday problem-solving) in ways that are meaningful and culturally situated, but these forms of reasoning don’t always get recognized as “math” in early-childhood settings because they don’t appear in school-like formats. Your reflection highlights that same issue: mathematics is already present inside cultural forms, and the real question becomes how institutions notice it, name it, and build on it without stripping it of meaning.
Your discussion question is making me think too, especially about what assessment would look like if we treated cultural design and explanation as valid mathematical reasoning, not an “extra.”
Lovely work in opening math to cultural, and even spiritual practices that are often the sources of philosophical wisdom. How can we incorporate these in our math teaching, without trying to assess (numerically) what we don’t teach? A fascinating and relevant issue.
ReplyDelete